Editorial policy
The rules we hold ourselves to, published so you can check whether we follow them. Last updated 2026-08-19.
1. Sourcing
Every factual claim traces to a primary source: the printed Supplement Facts panel, the official order page, the published return policy, or peer-reviewed literature indexed on PubMed. We do not cite other affiliate sites, press releases distributed on behalf of the brand, or AI-generated summaries as evidence for a factual claim.
2. Dose verification
When a seller cites a study, we look up the dose that study used and compare it against the amount on the label. Both numbers are published side by side. This is the single most useful check in the supplement category and it is why the dose ledger exists.
3. Undisclosed means undisclosed
Where a manufacturer does not publish an amount, we write that it is not published. We do not estimate, infer from ingredient order, or describe an unknown quantity as though it were known.
4. Safety before benefits
On every substantive page, interaction and contraindication information appears above benefit information. Where a seller advertises a pharmacological mechanism, we publish the warnings that mechanism carries, whether or not the seller does.
5. Claims we will not repeat
We do not reproduce disease claims, unverifiable review counts, rankings with no named ranking body, or endorsements from individuals whose credentials cannot be checked. Where a seller makes such a claim, we identify it as unverifiable rather than passing it along.
6. Clinical review
Every page touching dosing, interactions, contraindications or physiological mechanism is reviewed by Dr. Adeola Bankole, PharmD, BCPS before publication. Clinical review covers factual accuracy and safety framing; it is not a product endorsement and does not constitute medical advice to any reader.
7. Dating and corrections
Every page carries the date its claims were last verified. When we are shown an error we correct it, note the correction, and re-date the page. Corrections go to editorial@jjellyblue.com and we aim to respond within five business days.
8. Commercial independence
We earn affiliate commission on purchases made through our links. No advertiser, manufacturer or affiliate network reviews our content before publication, and none has the ability to require a change to it. Our affiliate disclosure sets out the relationship in full.
9. Testimonials
Customer statements we publish are labelled as individual experiences. Accompanying portraits are identified as illustrative stock images. We do not publish star ratings or customer counts we cannot verify against a third-party platform.
10. Who we will tell not to buy
Where the evidence indicates a reader should not purchase — because of an interaction, a contraindication, or because their symptoms warrant medical assessment instead — we say so plainly, on the same page as the purchase link. A referral site that never says no is not a reference, it is an advertisement.